Eight English Edwards

Much like the Roman Catholic Popes, English monarchs get to choose the name by which they will be known. If or when Charles succeeds his mother, Elizabeth II, to the throne, he can be known as Charles III, or he could select a different name. Elizabeth’s father’s name was actually Albert Fredrick Arthur George, and prior to taking the throne, he was known as Prince Albert of York. On ascending to the throne, he decided to reign as George VI, hoping to provide a sense of continuity with his father, George V, especially after the abdication of his brother (see below).

Despite this, there are certain royal names that have been popular for one reason or another. There have been four Williams, six Georges, eight Henrys, and eight Edwards. Since today is E day in the A-to-Z Blogging Challenge, I have decided to take a very quick look at each of those eight Edwards. Books have been written on their reigns, but I will try to stick to a brief paragraph for each.

Edward I (reigned 1274-1307)

Edward was a powerful king, and tall at 6 feet 2 inches–an anomaly of the period that earned him the nickname “Longshanks”. Among his achievements was his subjugation of the Welsh (something others had tried with little success). He also built a number of castles, instituted Parliament, and campaigned against the Scots and their king, Robert the Bruce–for which he was known as the “hammer of the Scots.” On the negative side, he was known for his brutality toward the Scots, and also for expelling the Jews from England. His edict of expulsion wasn’t revoked until 1656. He suffered ill health toward the end of his reign, and eventually died of dysentery.

Edward II (r. 1307-1327)

Son of Edward I, but certainly not a chip of the old block. Despite the country being at war with Scotland, his interests lay more in entertainment and athletics. As a result, he reversed his father’s gains against Scotland, leading to the Battle of Bannockburn, where the English suffered a huge defeat at the hands of Robert the Bruce’s army. This was only one of a number of failures in his reign, both political and personal, which led to Parliament exerting power over the monarch and declaring him incompetent. At their persuasion, he abdicated in favor of his son. Edward was murdered later that same year.

Edward III (r. 1327-1377)

Edward was more like his grandfather than his father, and his reign is notable not only for its gains, but for its length, being only one of a few monarchs to have reigned more than 50 years. During his reign, Edward pushed back against the Scots winning some victories, but eventually signing a truce. He declared himself rightful king of France, triggering the Hundred Years’ War. Also during his reign, the Black Death ravaged Europe, resulting in millions of deaths–perhaps as much as 60% of Europe’s population died. By the time a stroke claimed Edward’s life, England was a powerful military state, the power of Parliament had grown, and confidence in the monarchy had been restored.

Edward IV (r. 1461-1483)

The feud between the Lancastrians and the Yorkists began with competing claims to the throne. From the reign of Henry IV in 1399 through to the deposition of Henry VI in 1461, the country had been ruled by Lancastrians. The Yorkists, however, believed they had a better claim to the throne, and rose up against the ruling family. Known as the Wars of the Roses (the Lancastrian heraldic symbol was a red rose, the Yorkist a white rose), this conflict extended through the reigns of six kings in the form of sporadic conflicts. Edward was the first of the Yorkist kings to take the throne. After some battles early in his reign, he was able to suppress the Lancastrian threat to bring relative peace to the land. His death came about perhaps as a result of illness, or due to an inactive and unhealthy lifestyle in his later years.

Edward V (r. 1483)

Edward was just 12 years old when he ascended the throne, and hence was under the protection of his uncle Richard, Duke of Gloucester, as per his father’s will. Not long after his coronation, questions about his legitimacy surfaced resulting in him taking up residency in the Tower of London, along with his younger brother. With no better claimant to the throne coming forward, Richard was crowned Richard III. No-one knows for certain what eventually happened to the princes in the Tower. It is widely conjectured that they were murdered (especially given the spurious nature of the illegitimacy claim), and Richard is often fingered (among others) as the culprit.

Edward VI (r. 1547-1553)

Edward was Henry VIII’s only son, born to him by his third wife, Jane Seymour, who died not long after giving birth. Although Edward was only nine when he became king, and died at age 15, his reign was important because he first established the Church of England as a Protestant Church. While Henry VIII had separated from Rome, his main complaint was over the power of the Pope, not so much with Catholic doctrine. Henry was no fan of Martin Luther. However, Edward was much more Protestant in his thinking, as were those leading the Regency Council who governed on the young king’s behalf. Edward was always a sickly child, and when his last illness was deemed terminal, he drew up a decree of succession that named his cousin Lady Jane Grey as his rightful heir, and excluded his half-sisters Mary and Elizabeth. After his death, this declaration was challenged, Lady Jane Grey imprisoned, and Roman Catholic Mary took the throne, starting a tumultuous period for the church in England.

Edward VII (r. 1901-1910)

The oldest son of Queen Victoria, Edward was already sixty when he became king, thanks to his mother’s 63-year reign. His first name was actually Albert, after his father, but he chose to rule as Edward. During his lengthy stint as “heir apparent,” and especially after his father’s death when his mother withdrew from public life, Edward took on a number of public duties. The royal appearances that have become a part of royal life today started with Edward VII. As king, he was very involved in European affairs, which is understandable given that he was related to just about every other European monarch. His least favorite relative, however, was his cousin Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany (the Kaiser Wilhelm of World War I fame). He died after a bout of severe bronchitis and several heart attacks. (Click here to watch Edward VII’s funeral procession.)

Edward VIII (r. 1936)

On the death of his father, George V, Edward became king. Only a few months later, he proposed marriage to an American divorcee, Wallis Simpson. The resulting constitutional crisis (it was an unwritten rule that monarchs were not to marry “commoners,” foreigners, or divorcees, and Wallis Simpson was all three) led to his abdication from the throne in favor of his brother, Albert, who reigned as George VI. In the film “The King’s Speech,” Edward is depicted as being indifferent to affairs of state, and more interested in parties and socializing. This may not be far off the mark, though he was known to meddle in politics, much to the frustration of the politicians. After his abdication, he visited Germany and met with Adolf Hitler. The Fuhrer certainly got the impression that the ex-king was a Nazi sympathizer. The former king expressed admiration for the way Hitler rebuilt Germany, and seemed to indicate a favorable attitude toward German fascism. The British government was concerned enough with him to exile him to the Bahamas. Edward died in 1972 after a period of declining health. (Click here for the audio of Edward VIII’s abdication speech.)

I know these articles are supposed to be brief, but it’s hard to pack a lot of information into a short space. Thanks for bearing with me!

cds

Colin D. Smith, writer of blogs and fiction of various sizes.

You may also like...

12 Responses

  1. Elodie says:

    Very very interesting!

    I am always very fascinated by history and find it hard sometimes to not lose track of the different royal families…So your post is very helpful!

    Hubby and I finally watched The King’s speech recently and it was really a wonderful and moving movie!

    • cds says:

      The English monarchy has been a bit of a pet subject of mine for many many years, so this was fun and interesting for me too. You can imagine, then, when The King’s Speech came out, I really wanted to see it. Although there are some historical inaccuracies, it’s still an amazing story, and a superb film. It deserved every single Oscar it received, and a whole lot more! If you listen to the original abdication speech I’ve linked to, and compare it to Guy Pierce’s rendition of it in the movie, you can hear what a great job Guy did mimicking Edward VIII. πŸ™‚

  2. DayDreamer says:

    Nice and concise bit of history on the Edwards. Put down in this way we can see that the name Edward was used spread over a considerable amount of time. Incidentally I have been to the place where Edward II was put to his gruesome death – not too far from where I live.

    • cds says:

      Thanks, DayDreamer! I thought it was a good idea, but then I realized not everyone is as interested in history as me, so it became a real challenge to make it short and fun, as well as informative. I’m glad you liked it. πŸ™‚

      There are so many “royal” sites I never visited when I lived in England that I wish I could visit. That’s so cool that you live near to one!

  3. Jaime says:

    So interesting! I love history and I especially like reading about the English monarchy (though I probably shouldn’t what with the Scots-Irish heritage). You mentioned The King’s Speech… I loved that movie πŸ™‚ I kind of want to start a bit of an English monarchy movie collection. I have a few already to start it off.

    Question for you: Would you rather see Charles or William take the throne next (in a million years from now when QE2 no longer reigns)?

    And can I just say, I love being part of the Commonwealth. I really hope Canada never gets the hare-brained notion to remove itself.

    • cds says:

      Did you ever see the series “Monarchy” presented by Dr. David Starkey? Fascinating! If you’re interested in the English monarchy, this series gives a really good overview starting with the Saxons and going through at least to Diana’s death, maybe perhaps even discussing Charles and Camilla. Check it out, if you get a chance.

      I don’t think there’s any harm in letting Charles take his place in line. My impression is that he has pretty successfully repaired his character in the eyes of the people, and would be accepted as king. I haven’t seen or heard much about Charles in recent years, but I get the sense that he has learned to balance tradition with modernity, and would be a popular king. Especially with his charitable interests, I don’t see him meddling much in government and continuing to champion things close to his heart, and doing his best to represent England (and the Commonwealth).

      Another point to bear in mind: Charles will follow in the footsteps of Edward VII, as in he will be an elderly king given the long reign of his predecessor (Elizabeth celebrates her diamond jubilee–60 years–this year, so she’s only three years away from beating Victoria’s record). Who knows how long he will actually be king? Whether or not Charles takes the throne, the likelihood that William will be king one day is pretty good. Charles is 63 now, and could be close to 70, or older, by the time his turn comes. If lives to 100, that only gives him 30 years on the throne, by which time William will only be in his 50s.

      Sorry, I could gab about this stuff for hours!

      If I might be a little controversial for a moment, I have long held the view that Great Britain has far more in common with Commonwealth countries than she has with Europe. That’s not a slur against Europe, but just a recognition that there is far greater cultural diversity between the UK and Europe than there is between, say, the UK and Canada. The Commonwealth alliances just make better sense to me. But that’s just me. πŸ™‚

      • Jaime says:

        I’ll definitely have to check that series out. I find it all very fascinating. As for Charles, I think you’re right about him repairing his image quite a bit in the last decade or so. I don’t think I’d mind seeing him or William on the throne. I’m rooting for QE2 to beat Victoria’s record. That would be very cool πŸ™‚

        I agree with you 100% about GB and the Commonwealth vs. GB and Europe. I love the Commonwealth. I feel like we’re part of a really cool club or something lol πŸ™‚ And no slight against the USA, but I sometimes feel like we have far more in common with a lot of Commonwealth countries like Australia and New Zealand than we do with our neighbours to the South. Again, no slight intended to our American friends.

        Very interesting stuff!

        • cds says:

          I read somewhere that someone (reportedly the Queen, but I find that hard to believe) said that the Commonwealth was essentially the civilized version of the British Empire. πŸ™‚ I don’t know about that, but indeed, I would agree that the UK has spent far too much time currying favo(u)r with the US and Europe (both of whom they’ve been to war with more than once), and not enough time building Commonwealth relationships. Oh well.

  4. I’m fascinated by the history of the monarchy. This was a great post! Very illustrative and I actually learned a few things. Nice!

    Thanks for visiting my place.
    From Diary of a Writer in Progress

  5. Gerri says:

    I love the English monarchy so this post really struck a cord with me. Thanks and great job!

Share your thoughts... I usually reply!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.