Category Archives: Reading

Don’t Wait ‘Til It’s Too Late!

The last month or so has seen the passing of a couple of celebrity authors. Sue Grafton, writer of the “alphabet” mystery series, passed away on December 28, 2017. And then popular and influential sci-fi/fantasy author Ursula K. Le Guin died January 22, 2018. Both had a long and strong body of work, and were in their senior years when they died. However, they were mourned by many, and their loss will be felt by fans for a long time.

As I watched people on Twitter share their appreciation and love for these authors and the books they had written, telling how much they had been impacted by their work, a thought crossed my mind:

Did they ever say these things to these authors when they were alive?

I’m not judging. It’s possible many did. Besides, I share the guilt of leaving it too late to tell an author or musician how much their work has inspired me. So I say this to myself as much as to anyone else: don’t wait. Especially today, when many authors have made themselves available on social media, even if they are mega-famous, and you’ll probably never get a reply, drop them an email or a Tweet. Leave a comment on their blog. In some way, communicate to them the things you would say at their passing, only do it while they can still read and be blessed by your words.

No writer is too famous or too popular for recognition. Indeed, for a writer, to know that their work is read and has made an impact on people’s lives, is better than the royalty checks. Whether it’s a celebrity author, or a first-time novelist, or perhaps even a short story writer, if you love their work, let them know!

The Unique Power of Reading, Part 2

Last time I talked about the power of reading to communicate with the dead. Well, better put, to have the dead communicate with us. Though the author may have shed the chains of mortality many decades ago, their thoughts, ideas, and stories are still with us, and we can read them and hear their voice speak to us from the page.

Let’s push that idea a little further. If you read this blog regularly, you know about Doctor Who. Even if it’s from seeing (but not necessarily reading) the Who Reviews. Doctor Who is a TV show about an alien who travels in time and space in a police box called a TARDIS. The remarkable thing about this TARDIS, aside from being able to travel in time and space, is the fact that it is bigger on the inside than on the outside. On the outside, it looks like a blue box, barely big enough for two people standing. Inside, there is a cavernous control room, and a seemingly-infinite number of rooms and corridors and cubby holes. There’s a whole world, a whole dimension of existence, within those walls, that can swallow you up and keep you exploring for days.

Not only can a book take you back in time so you can hear Dickens tell you about Victorian London through the eyes of Oliver Twist, or have Agatha Christie transport you to Twenties England with Hercule Poirot, but within it’s covers is a vast world to explore. In fantasy novels, the world will be mapped and detailed, such as Tolkien’s Middle Earth, Lewis’s Narnia, or Rowling’s wizarding world. In these tales, and others like them, you get a sense of vastness, of places unexplored, expanses that are as limitless as your imagination. Other novels will take you to real places, maybe places you’ve never been, captured in a moment of time. Whether it’s the smells, culture, and drama of Haiti in Edwidge Danticat’s BREATH, EYES, MEMORY, or Kabul at the turn of the twenty-first century in Khaled Hosseini’s A THOUSAND SPLENDID SUNS.

Wherever it might be, imagined or real, within the space of a few hundred pages between two covers, you have your very own TARDIS to travel the universe and traverse the space-time continuum, to visit strange, and not-so-strange new worlds, without leaving the comfort of your favorite chair.

Reading gives you the power to be a Time Lord!

And when things in this world seem to get out of control, and become hard to deal with, that can be a wonderful thing.

The Unique Power of Reading, Part 1

Most people in the world can read. About 98% of Americans are literate to some extent. Heck, you’re doing it right now! Unless you just came to look at the pictures. And if you say, “yes, I’m just here for the pictures,” then AHA! Caught you! You had to read that statement to agree with it. So, admit it: you read. Along with the vast majority of the people around you. Which means, like many of us, you probably take the fact you read for granted. Like many, myself included, you pick up a book, a magazine, turn on the internet (I know you don’t turn on the internet… it’s just there, like radio and bacteria…) and take in the words in front of you.

But have you thought about what you’re doing? Really thought about? Let’s do that for a moment.

What does it mean to read? Reading is the receiving end of an act of communication. Someone, somewhere, somewhen wrote something to entertain you, or to inform you, or to make you think. You read it, and, as a result, you are entertained, informed, or thinking about what was written. No other species on the planet can do that, which means you and I are very, very special. There are 8.7 million species on the planet (according to The Internet), but ours is the only one that reads. Sure, birds can sing to each other, and skunks stink love messages. But when was the last time a skunk captured their smell to send to their hottie? Birds don’t make mp3s of their music. And cats don’t send each other hate mail…

We humans have a complex variety of communication methods, most popularly using words (not discounting body language, sign language, and emojis). With these words we make each other laugh, express the deepest longings of our souls, sass each other, educate each other, and tell stories. We like that last one especially. And from Egyptian walls to parchment to the printing press, we’ve taken time to capture those words and ideas for posterity. Which means, I don’t have to summon H.G. Wells from the dead to hear his story about the Martians invading London. Or do I? Because when I open this book…

… and start reading:

“No-one would have believed, in the last years of the nineteenth century, that human affairs were being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own…”

H.G. Wells is speaking to me from the grave. His words from 119 years ago are alive in my head as I read them. The same pictures he painted in the minds of his Victorian audience begin to form in my mind. Wells’s body may be long gone from this earth, but his voice lives whenever I pick up and read his work.

Reading has the power to bring the dead to life!

Consider that next time you read a book by Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, Oscar Wilde, or Ian Fleming. They are still telling you their stories, even though their physical voices have been silenced. When you read their words, it’s as if they are sitting right there with you, speaking to you. Entertaining you. Informing you. Making you think.

More on the power of reading in the next post. Stay tuned!  🙂

Some Thoughts on Reading and Writing

A while ago, there was a discussion on Janet Reid’s blog around how much you should read in your chosen genre before you write that genre.* The received wisdom is 100 books. Yes, 100 books in your genre of choice, before you commit to writing that novel. Some of you can easily burn through a 300-page novel in an afternoon, so 100 books is a summer vacation assignment. For others who, due to time constraints, or other reasons, are not fast readers, that sounds like a six-month commitment. Maybe longer. I’m doing really well if I can get through 50 books in a year at the moment. What does that mean for the person chomping at the bit, eager to write their big crime novel, who has only read a handful of Sherlock Holmes and Agatha Christie stories, and maybe one or two Michael Connelly and Lee Child books? Must they wait?

Here’s my take on this dilemma, for what it’s worth. I’m an as-yet unpublished writer, so I offer these thoughts for consideration, not as proven method. Indeed, I invite discussion in the comments.

What’s the Point of the Rule?

Whenever anyone spouts a so-called “rule” of writing, I’m immediately skeptical. For every rule, there’s a successful (and talented) author who has broken it. But these “rules” end up in how-to books and Writer’s Digest articles, so there must be a reason for them.

Before embracing or endorsing the rule, I ask a simple question: “What’s the point of the rule?” Because behind every writing rule, there are scores of literary agents and editors throwing paper, pencils, and laptops around in frustration at yet another dim-witted wannabe writer who doesn’t know his apostrophes from his asterisks, writing boring, been-there-done-that, prose, thinking they’re the next Hemingway.

Behind this particular rule is the idea that in order to write something original, you need to have a good feel for what’s been done. Also, if you want to get a good idea of how your novel fits into the general canon of the genre, you need to have a familiarity with that canon. All this helps the agent and publisher sell your book. If you’re writing another re-hash of a P.D. James plot, then no-one’s going to be interested.

That’s all well and good. BUT

You and I know there are plenty of books out there with settings and plots that all ring familiar. And yet millions buy them and enjoy them. Why? I think because each writer brings something unique to the telling of the story. Whether it’s their style, their “voice,” or their characters, or their peculiar perspective on the familiar, or something else, there’s a reason we keep turning the pages. It’s like a Columbo mystery, where we know who did it and how it’s going to end up within the first ten minutes of the show. And yet we keep watching because we love Columbo, and we love watching how he solves the murder.

If you ask me, I think writers should definitely be readers, and read as much and as often as possible. Writers should also write, and write as much as they can as often as they can. As a writer you should feel free to imitate styles, try out different genres, and find your voice and perspective. Then write whatever the heckovellia you want to write. Even if you’ve only read a couple of books in that genre. The worst that can happen is no-one will read it. But have fun. Enjoy what you write. If you’ve got any talent, you’ll know if what you’ve written is worthless dung,** or if you’re onto something. After that, all the usual “rules” about getting beta readers and so on apply.

What do you think? Disagree if you want. After all, what do I know? 🙂

* I’ve realized that I’ve probably written more in the comments on Janet’s blog articles than I’ve written articles on my own blog! Okay, perhaps an exaggeration, but that’s an imbalance I ought to redress.

** As opposed to priceless dung? I’m sure flies and beetles can tell the difference.

Book Review: THE SINGER FROM MEMPHIS by Gary Corby

Herodotus, an aspiring author, turns up at Nicolaos and Diotima’s house to ask if Nico would escort him to the land of the Pharaohs. It seems he wants to write about the past, and is traveling around collecting stories, and chronicling the customs of all manner of civilizations. Given that Egypt is currently a hotbed of unrest, with the natives rising up against their Persian overlords, Herodotus needs an experienced security detail, and Nico came recommended. When Nico discovers it was Pericles who recommended him, he’s convinced there’s more to this than perhaps even Herodotus knows. Indeed, there’s a lot at stake, namely who is the rightful ruler of Egypt. Nico and Diotima will have to navigate Persians, Spartans, cats, camels, crocodiles, and secret agents to fulfill their duty to Herodotus, and also complete the secret task to which Pericles has assigned them, if they manage to stay alive.

This is the sixth in Gary Corby’s “Athenian Mysteries” series, featuring the husband-and-wife detective team (sorry–that was a spoiler if you’ve only read the first couple of books!) of Nicolaos and Diotima. I’ve reviewed a couple of the other books in the series, and it never ceases to amaze me how well Gary does his homework to get the historical details right, while never sounding like a text book. Naturally, he sometimes plays a little loose with facts for the sake of story, but he knows when he’s doing that, as is evident from his “Author’s Note” at the end.

The main new character in this book is Herodotus, known to students of Ancient History as “the Father of History.” His HISTORIES is not only the earliest history book we know of, but it also contains accounts of historical events that we would know little or nothing of otherwise. Gary weaves some of Herodotus’s stories into the narrative, as young Herodotus interviews everyone he encounters, pummeling people with questions, writing everything down on sheets of papyrus, and perhaps being a little too trusting that what he’s being told is totally factual. I think it’s great that Gary manages to take this shadowy figure from the past, known only by his one book (at least, the only one that has survived to this day), and give him life and character, making him into someone quite likable. After reading this, you might actually want to pick up a copy of THE HISTORIES!

But history aside, the strength of Gary’s books is the storytelling, and he keeps the pace going, with plenty of cliffhangers, and humor. As Nico’s interest is divided among various parties vying for his attention, the plot thickens, but never becomes too tangled. There’s also a very touching death scene, which I don’t recall the like of in any of the other books in the series. I don’t want to spoil it, but I’ll say it’s a character I came to like, and was sad to see killed off. It’s beautifully written, and liable to evoke tears–be warned!

Fans of the series will not be disappointed by THE SINGER FROM MEMPHIS. If you’re new to the series, you can certainly read this without having read the others, but don’t be surprised if you find yourself wanting to go back and start at the beginning (THE PERICLES COMMISSION was the first). There’s hardly any, if any, profanity, and some very mild sexual allusions. I’d rate it PG15, and give it an easy five GoodReads stars.

A to Z Catch Up #3

April is just flying by with less than a week to go on the 2016 April A-to-Z Challenge. If you don’t know what that’s about, click the link to find out. Those of you who have been visiting over the past few weeks know I’ve been posting 100-word flash fiction stories inspired by Paul McCartney song titles. Yes, there are enough Macca tunes to cover the alphabet… well, almost. Were you surprised by Q? There are some tricky letters coming up, so stay tuned!

Here’s where we’ve been:

This Week Last Week Previously
One of These Days
Pretty Little Head
Queenie Eye
That Day Is Done
I’m Carrying
Keep Undercover
Live and Let Die
My Brave Face
No Words
Another Day
Backwards Traveller
Coming Up
Every Night
Fine Line
Hope of Deliverance

There won’t be another “catch up” next week, but there will be a “Reflections” post sometime in May. I hope you’ve enjoyed reading these stories. They’ve been fun to write. This blog will return to normal programming in a week.

Here are some other A-to-Z blogs I’ve enjoyed:

  • Word Wacker: Celia Reeves has been posting haiku puzzles.
  • TheArtOfNotGettingPublished: Susan Brody has been providing examples of 16th century (and older) predecessors to modern inventions. Her purpose is to show that we moderns are not as clever as we might think.
  • Jen Seriously: Jen’s posts have been inspired by the International Spelling Alphabet (you know, Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Delta…)
  • Maybe it’s just me…: Andrea has been blogging about movie soundracks that matter to her.

Tomorrow’s A-to-Z post will be… a 100-word story based on a Paul McCartney song that starts with U. And that’s all I’m saying for now. If you want to know what song I chose, come back tomorrow! 🙂

Links and Stuff

This week, I play with mirrors, pick up birds, and get lost in translation. But first, it’s March already, my birthday month (search the blog to find out exactly when–I’m sure I mentioned it somewhere)! It’s the month spring begins and the clocks change (at least for those who participate in such things). Time has flown, and speaking of flying, let’s dive straight into this week’s…

Legend of Zelda Update

Medli-tww-hdI continued my journey through “Wind Waker,” guided by SecondBorn, by tackling the third of the four temples/dungeons: The Earth Temple. This was the first time in the game I’d had to solicit help from another character, namely Medli. She’s a Rito, and hence has a beak and is able to sprout wings and fly. With Medli on my shoulders, she can fly me places, which came in very handy in the Earth Temple. The item I acquired that I needed to complete the temple was a mirror shield. Many of the puzzles in the temple depend on finding light sources and reflecting light. Medli has a mirror, so on occasion I needed to position her in such a way that light bounced from her to me, then from me to wherever the light needed to go.

There were some nasty bad guys in this temple, but the final Boss battle caught me a bit off guard. It involved fighting a giant spirit, or “Poe,” called Jalhalla, whose translucent form would make me giddy if it landed on me, causing me to run into giant spikes that circled the walls of his lair. The only way to fight him was to make him tangible, which I could only do by… yes, shining light on him. I could then pick him up and throw him against the spikes, which caused him to break apart. The trick then was to try to destroy the parts before he pulled himself together again. I watched FourthBorn do this battle a few days before, and she sailed through it in minutes. “Can’t be too bad,” I thought. Ha! It took me a lot longer, and cost me a lot of life energy before I finally defeated him. It didn’t help that after the first few rounds, the light source kept moving, so I was having to dodge out of Jalhalla’s way while looking for the light.

After my performance in that skirmish, SecondBorn doesn’t hold out much hope for me surviving the last temple and the final battle with Ganon. We shall see…

Other Stuff

BarnesNoble-logoIt seems Barnes and Noble is planning to open hybrid stores that incorporate elements of both the brick and mortar and the online experience. The Publishers Weekly article didn’t go into a lot of detail, so I’m not exactly sure how they intend to blend physical and digital. They already offer free wi-fi throughout their stores, so I’m not sure what other “digital” things they could provide. I read that Amazon are opening some brick-and-mortars that will offer things like the ability to have your purchases shipped for free to a store for pickup. I don’t recall if B&N already do something like that. I guess we’ll have to wait and see for the details.

I’ve also been reading positive news about paper book sales that indicate people are far from going totally digital. Publishers are reporting good sales figures, which is great news for regular bookstores. Sure, Amazon can ship books to you, but as long as people want the physical product, brick-and-mortars can couple that with an atmosphere: coffee, chairs, book signings, readings, and events.

Someone posted this link on Twitter to an article about book translation. I’m sure my lack of fluency in a modern language puts me at a disadvantage when it comes to non-English authors, so I was very interested in this article. Whenever I read Dostoevsky or Tolstoy, I wonder if I’m getting the original author’s voice, or the translator’s. I trust the translator is accurately communicating the author’s intent, but is it possible to convey the nuance and texture of the original language in a foreign translation? I’m not sure the article answers that question, but it’s a fascinating read, anyway.

This week I finished reading COP TOWN by Karin Slaughter. Those of you who read my Bouchercon articles last October will know I saw Karin on one of the panels, and got to meet her briefly afterwards. She was one of the best panelists of the event, I think, which does dispose me to want to read her books. COP TOWN is essentially the story of two female police officers in Atlanta in 1974. One of the cops is a rookie, the other has been on the force for a few years, and both her uncle and brother are police officers. Together these ladies have to deal with the sexism, racism, and inefficiencies that surrounded police work in the mid-1970s, while helping to hunt down a cop killer. It’s not a comfortable read. Karin doesn’t glory in sex and blood, but she tells it like it is (or was, in this case). There’s profanity, adult themes, and violence, but if you can handle that, it’s a good read. I particularly appreciated the way Karin managed to conjure the atmosphere of 1970s Atlanta. That must have taken some research. Four out of five Goodreads stars.

And finally for this week, a quick A-to-Z 2016 Blogging Challenge update: I have written all 26 of my articles! Now I’m itching to share them with you… but that’ll have to wait until April. Look out for my theme reveal later in the month.

How has your week been? Anything interesting to share? Any thoughts on the above? Zelda tips?

Links and Stuff: The 1,000th Blog Post Edition

Yes, ladies and gentlemen–this is it. My 1,000th blog article! That’s a lot of blogging. I know there are people out there who have been blogging longer and no doubt clocked up thousands of pages. But this is a milestone for me. Think about it. If each post is, on average, 500 words long (there are plenty of posts much longer and much shorter than 500 words, so I think this number works), that’s 500,000 words. About 6 average-size novels. Or about two Stephen King (or George R. R. Martin) novels. Wow.

Before we get to the actual Links and Stuff for today, I’d like to take a moment to say THANK YOU to everyone who stops by to read, and maybe even comment. I hope you’ve found something here to entertain and/or inform over the past four-and-a-half years, and you will continue to drop by. Here’s to the next 1,000 articles!

Legend of Zelda Update

This was a busy weekend, so I didn’t get much Zelda time. Saturday evening, SecondBorn did some “map marking” for me. Much of the travel in Wind Waker is by boat, so part of the challenge is finding out where all the different islands are, and charting them on your map so you can visit them. ThirdBorn, my son, thinks I should have done this because, for him, part of the fun of the game is exploring the world and discovering these things for oneself. SecondBorn thinks the sailing around is boring, and she would sooner do the map-marking for me so we can use our time together for the actual quest. Since SecondBorn is guiding my game-play, I’m happy to do it her way. However, I plan, at some point, to play the HD version of Wind Waker (did I mention I’m playing the GameCube version?) unaided. That’ll be my time to explore.

It was, therefore, with a fully marked-up map that I set sail on Sunday. Given our limited time, SecondBorn had me do some “housekeeping.” This involved a game of hide-and-seek on Outset Island, and sailing to some “fairy islands” to upgrade my quiver and my money bag so they hold more, and to get some heart pieces and money. I’m sure all of these will become important later (I definitely welcome the extra life that comes from the heart pieces–I’ll need that!). So no dungeons, temples, or Bosses this time. But hopefully, I’m a little more prepared for what’s to come…

Other Stuff

Harper Lee, author of the modern classic TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD passed away this week, aged 89. I’m sure I’ve said on this blog (there are, after all, 1,000 articles here now!), and certainly elsewhere, that I consider TKaM to be the closest thing to the perfect novel. It’s thought-provoking, full of deep and interesting characters, and told with a distinctive voice. Although a “sequel” was published last summer (GO SET A WATCHMAN, which I reviewed HERE), in all honesty, TKaM was Lee’s only book. GSaW was her first draft from which TKaM was born, and I think that needs to be remembered in all discussions about it. There’s still doubt over whether she really ever wanted GSaW to be published. But I think, given the fifty-year gap between the two books, and the way GSaW is written, it’s clear that the story in TKaM was the one she intended us to know. That’s why, for me, Harper Lee will always be the writer of one, and only one novel. A novel many writers would give their entire catalog to have written.

This past weekend, Janet Reid hosted another writing contest. To my astonishment, my entry was selected as one of the nine finalists. I didn’t win, but if you check them out, you’ll understand why I feel particularly honored and humbled to be counted among these entries. There’s usually a high caliber of writing talent on display in these contests, but this one was particularly spectacular. The winning entry got my vote–such a clever use of rhythm and word-play.

Finally, March is only a week away, and before you know it, Easter will be past, and the A-to-Z Blogging Challenge will be upon us! If you have a blog, and want it to get more attention, you should consider signing up for this (about 840 people have signed up so far). I’ve written all but 7 of my posts, and I hope to finish them by the end of the month. If you want to know what I’ll be writing about for the month of April, March 21 is “Theme Reveal” day, so you can find out then. The sign-up for that posted yesterday on the A-to-Z Challenge site.

That’s all I have!

Bouchercon 2015 Debrief: Day Three

In which the air turns blue, the heavens open, and our hero says goodbye to his friends.

Bouchercon2015LogoSaturday was my last day of Bouchercon. The convention actually continued through Sunday afternoon, but I wanted to get back home for church, and give my wife some relief from single parenting. Since it was a Saturday, the roads were almost deserted, as was the parking lot. I made it to the Marriott before 8 am, in time to catch some of the Meet the New Authors (& Publisher) breakfast, hosted by Les and Leslie Blatt. I was surprised how well attended this was considering the early hour, especially for a Saturday. Perhaps the bars closed early Friday night.

There were a lot of new authors there, so the moderator called up a group of four or five at a time, and then gave each person one minute to tell us about their novel. That doesn’t seems like much time, but it’s a great opportunity if you have a memorable premise and a catchy pitch. I spoke to one author later, and she told me her book was about a murder, and someone with Alzheimer’s. I stopped her and said, “Is that the one where the lady with Alzheimer’s witnesses the crime, but no-one can be sure of the accuracy of her testimony–whether she’s remembering what she saw, or whether it’s a memory from long ago?” To which she replied, “Yes, that’s it.” The author then gave me a bookmark to help me remember her novel. Until that week, in fact, until that day, I underestimated how useful those bookmarks are for advertising.

01 0700 Meet the New Authors

Meet the New Authors

I was doing pretty well with my list of people to meet, so I decided to cross another off the list by popping back over to the Sheraton for Visceral Entertainment: Where Do You Draw the Line? featuring Karin Slaughter, along with J. D. Rhoades, Lee Goldberg, Lisa Unger, and Twist Phelan (the moderator). Not only did this panel contain two people with the most career-appropriate names (Slaughter and Twist), but it was also one most likely to stir controversy. After all, the issue of sex and violence in entertainment is a hot topic in our culture. And the authors represented at the table are among those most known for not always holding back. Karin said she has never been asked by her editor to dial back the violence, though she always tries to be realistic, to show the violence for what it is, and not glorify it. Indeed, she’s often accused of writing more than she actually writes. She gets letters saying, “Why did you have to put this, that, and the other in that novel?” when in fact she didn’t. All she did was suggest this, that, and the other; the reader’s imagination did the rest.

Lee said he feared some writers go over the top just for the sake of trying to outdo other writers. Karin Slaughter had this in her last novel, so I’m going to have this and this! Lisa defended depictions of violence in fiction as a way to get those things out of the system, put them on paper, and have justice served. Generally, in fiction the bad guys get their comeuppance. Not always in real life. Fiction-violence helps us deal with it. As a trial lawyer, J.D. has seen and heard a lot of very disturbing stuff. For him, it’s a form of purging to get all that stuff out of his head and onto the page.

Weak writers write “murder porn” according to Lee, and it becomes a crutch to try to make their work competitive. They can’t go toe-to-toe with talented writers, so they draw their audience with outlandishly graphic content, instead of trying to be innovative and clever.

Karin advocated talking about violent crime because those who commit such crimes in real life depend on our silence. “It’s great George Clooney is concerned about rape in Darfur,” she said. “But what about rape in L.A.?”

In the end, J.D. said, most true crime is about people being stupid and screwing up, making one bad decision after another. It’s not so much about evil people working out their evil schemes on the innocent.

Then came the question about swearing, and how much is appropriate. No-one on the panel had a problem with using cuss words, and, for a good five or ten minutes they regaled the audience with their favorite profanities. F*s, s*s, and m-f*s filled the room as the panelists talked about their favorite scenes from TV shows where such language was used creatively. However, they acknowledged that, as with sex and violence, such things should be used appropriately and for the right reason, not just to push an envelope or shock the reader.

03 0830 Visceral Entertainment-Where Do You Draw the Line (Panel) 2

Visceral Entertainment: Where Do You Draw the Line? L-R: Karin Slaughter, Lee Goldberg, Twist Phelan, Lisa Unger, and J.D. Rhoades.

At the beginning of the panel, Twist read author bios, starting with Karin. She got half-way through the description of her latest novel when it became clear to us, and Karin, that the bio was giving away all the major plot points of the novel. Karin stopped her and said to the audience, “Just pre-order the next one.”

Since the panelists were on a stage, it was a little awkward getting to them afterward, so I waited until they adjourned to the book room/signing room. Karin didn’t have a line, so I took the opportunity to shake her hand, thank her for her comments (she was, by far, the wittiest of the panelists, at least IMO), and tell her I enjoyed CRIMINAL and hope to read more of her work. I didn’t have anything to sign, but as a writer I know how much feedback like that is appreciated.

04 David Morrell, writer of FIRST BLOOD

David Morrell

While gazing along the row of authors waiting to sign books (some with longer lines than others), I noticed David Morrell. For those who don’t know, he wrote FIRST BLOOD, the book that inspired the first “Rambo” movie. Janet mentioned to me on Thursday that she had met him and told him she once wrote a paper comparing Rambo with Beowulf. His line was long, and I had nothing for him to sign, so I settled for taking his picture.

My next panel choice served two purposes. The first was to meet Sophie Littlefield. I really enjoyed her novel, THE MISSING PLACE, which I won in a Janet Reid writing contest. The second purpose was to get some YA mystery novel ideas for my 15-year-old daughter who has started writing stories, and needs to do more reading. This led me to Criminally Young at Heart, a panel that Sophie renamed The YA Panel, with Alan Gratz, Cara Brookins, Megan Miranda, Penny Pike Warner, and Sophie Littlefield (the moderator).

The first question spoke to the diverse nature of the panelists books: why don’t they stick to one genre within YA? Some of the authors said they like diving into an area of research, then leaving it for another. Others talked about writing what they are passionate about at that time, and how that passion will change from book to book. They all like having the flexibility to write the book that speaks to them at that moment. Next they talked about where their books fit within the Education-Entertainment-Inspiration spectrum. Most seem to put an emphasis on entertainment. As Alan said, kids don’t have the patience to give books a chance. A novel has to grab them from the get-go. On the other hand, kids like learning about things. They like picking up details on a subject from a novel and then sharing them with their friends. Penny’s novels include codes for the reader to crack, which sneakily helps them with their cognitive skills. Cara said she primarily writes for herself, but also feels a responsibility to her readers that her stories have a satisfactory conclusion. She thinks this is partly because she has a 10-year-old, and that’s the kind of world her child wants. This might change in a few years.

The panelists also addressed the issue of gender in middle grade and young adult, something that is often a bone of contention. Penny talked about how her stories have two male and two female protagonists, so she hopes that helps to draw both to her work. Alan’s main character is a boy, but he didn’t set out to write “boys’ books.” He would like to see boys reading books about girls as much as girls read books about boys. Megan also has both genders represented in her main characters, but, like Alan, doesn’t really consider her work as geared toward one over the other. She’s more concerned with making her books exciting to read from page one, to entice the reluctant reader. Cara’s day job is in I.T., so she feels a part of the geek world. Perhaps that’s why her main characters are boys. The panelists all want to see more acceptance of female protagonists by both boys and girls in YA, and perhaps the success of THE HUNGER GAMES is a sign things are changing for the better.

05 1000 Criminally Young at Heart (The YA Panel)

The YA Panel. L-R: Sophie Littlefield, Cara Brookins, Alan Gratz, Penny Pike Warner, and Megan Miranda.

06 Megan Miranda signing A's bookI asked the panel for some book recommendations for my daughter. Megan suggested NEARLY GONE by Elle Cosimano, Alan thought she should try THE NATURALS by Jennifer Lynn Barnes, and Cara offered THE PEOPLE by Zenna Henderson, an older book, but one she thought my daughter would enjoy. For asking the second question of the Q&A, I was given a copy of Megan Miranda’s SOULPRINT, which I had her sign for my daughter.

I had lunch in the Marriott. This was the second time I had lunched on my own, but I hasten to add that on neither occasion did I actually end up eating alone. Both times I sharing a place at the bar with someone. On Thursday, I talked with a former school teacher who had written a novel about a teacher sent to Poland, who ends up arrested (I won’t give away the whole premise). She was in the query trenches and practicing her pitch, so I was glad to be a sounding board. Saturday, I ate with someone who had gone the self-publishing route, and had also set up a business to publish others. We had a good conversation about the relative virtues and drawbacks of traditional publishing and self-publishing.

What turned out to be my final panel of this Bouchercon was in the Sheraton. I made my way over, past the Mystery Writers of America table…

07 The MWA Desk

… to Maintaining Pace in Mystery Narrative. The original moderator for this panel, Monette Michaels, had been taken sick and was unable to be there, so Janet was asked to fill in for her. The lineup for this panel was Annette Dashofy, Hilary Davidson, Laura Benedict, Rebecca Drake, and Janet Reid (the moderator). Janet launched the discussion with a softball: What is pacing? Laura described it as the way the story unravels. “I know it when I don’t see it,” she said, to the collective nod of the room. Hilary likened pacing to a roller-coaster that pulls you along into and through the story. Rebecca pointed to the rhythm and word choice of the author that helps dictate the speed of the narrative. Janet then asked if the authors dealt with pacing in their first draft, or during revisions. Rebecca said she is aware of pacing during the first draft, but definitely pays more attention to it during revisions. Hilary said her pacing tends to slide in the first draft, so it’s something she picks up with later edits. If she finds herself wanting to skip over a section, then she knows the pacing’s off. Laura received hard stares from her fellow panelists when she confessed to only writing a first draft. Yes, she’s one of those writers that edits as she goes.

Picking up on Hilary’s answer, how do the panelists know when the pacing is off? Some read aloud to hear the rhythm. If the characters are doing something boring, then the story begins to drag. This can be especially true when the novel deals with technical details. Usually critique partners will point out when there’s too much information.

Have the panelists ever had to add things for pacing? A few of the panelists said they can be guilty of ending the novel too quickly. Also, if there’s a particularly painful scene, the writer can be tempted to move past it too quickly–especially if she doesn’t enjoy seeing her characters suffer. But that pain is important, and readers need to go through it with the character. Writers need to remember to let good things happen to their characters too.

Toward the end, the panelists discussed how a writer hooks a reader. The main hook seems to be asking questions, either directly, or indirectly planting questions in the reader’s mind. There should be at least one direct or indirect question per chapter, and when the question is answered, there should be more waiting in the wings. But the questions need to be answered, otherwise you frustrate the reader. “If you answer all the questions,” Janet pondered, “how do you build a series?” Hilary tackled this, explaining that there is an arc to each book in the series, and each arc has questions that need answering. However, there are “quiet” questions within each book that are left for other books to answer. It’s not that every question needs to be answered, but certainly all the main questions pertaining to each book’s arc.

I managed to snap a picture of the panel, so you’ll get to see Janet at last…

08 1300 Maintaining Pace in Mystery Narrative (Panel)3

Maintaining Pace in Mystery Narratives. L-R: Janet Reid, Annette Dashofy, Rebecca Drake, Hilary Davidson, Laura Benedict

HUH? What happened?? Are those… shark teeth…? Oh well…

Janet managed to avoid the kind of spoiler fiasco I witnessed earlier by asking each of the panelists to talk briefly about their latest book, and to tell us how we can get on an email list, or visit their social media platform. By this time I had already packed away my pad and pencil so I couldn’t write anything down. Of all the panelists, Hilary Davidson was the only one with bookmarks to hand, so I was able to get the information I needed for her. Again, those bookmarks may seem trivial, but they were very helpful to me. Future conference panelists, take note!

It was close to 2pm by the time we left, and if attending panels was thirsty work for Janet, you can only imagine how parched she was after moderating one! [I should note, at the risk of ruining her reputation, for all the time spent at the bar, and for all the drinks she consumed, Janet at least appeared to stay within the bounds of sobriety. Mostly.] Some days before, literary agent Jessica Faust had offered her blog readers the opportunity to book time with her at Bouchercon to pitch their novels. My current work in progress is nowhere near ready for pitching, but I did ask for time to chat, just to say hi. Jessica graciously slotted me into her schedule at 2:15 in the Marriott bar. As we sat down at our table in Jimmy V’s, I told Janet of my appointment. “That’s fine,” she said. “We’ll be here when you get back.” As I recall, the “we” included Patrick Lee (nytba), and Loretta Sue Ross.

Jessica Faust, Literary Agent and all-around nice person.

The first two Bouchercon days had been dry and sunny, so Raleigh decided it was time to give her visitors a taste of Carolina showers. Thankfully, it didn’t rain the whole time, but as we made our way between hotels, many of us felt the wet to some extent. It was only a little drizzly as I entered the Marriott, and I soon found Jessica. It seems my facial recognition isn’t too bad since I managed to pick out both Loretta and Jessica  solely on the basis of publicity pictures. Jessica and I didn’t chat for long, but within that time we talked about BookEnds (Jessica’s agency), what Jessica’s currently looking for (I told her I was a little surprised she was there–I didn’t peg her as a mystery/thriller agent), and she gave me opportunity to tell her about my WiP, which I didn’t expect. I thought I “pitched” it rather well, considering I wasn’t prepared to pitch anything. If I can remember what I said, I can use that to start crafting my query letter (it’s not a bad idea to write a query letter even before your novel’s finished–it helps keep you on track). Jessica said I could query her when the novel’s ready, and gave me her card. All in all, a good meeting, I think.

When I returned to Jimmy V’s, Janet, Patrick, and Loretta were still there. Janet asked how it went. “She’s definitely on my query list,” I said after my brief review. “You have a list?” Janet retorted. “You’re on it, too, ” I assured her with a nervous smile. Better men have lost limbs with the look she gave me. 🙂

Over the course of the next few hours, I said my goodbyes to Patrick and Loretta who had to leave. As I recall, Terri Lynn Coop joined us for a while, and told us stories of her misadventures the night before with her friends. I seem to remember her talking about a chocolate party, a “room of requirements,” and a couple of embarrassed hotel employees. Unfortunately, Terri had to go, so I said goodbye to her, and we then welcomed authors Ray Daniel and Rosemary Harris to the table (I swear, this is beginning to sound like The Tonight Show, or Graham Norton!). I felt privileged to sit and listen while Ray, Rosemary, and Janet talked not only about their families, and other non-writing things, but also talked “shop”. As someone on the pre-published side of the industry, this was a rare opportunity to get a taste of life on the other side from people who have been a part of that world for a while. Ray and Rosemary came up with some great opening lines for books based on their own life experiences (I won’t share in case they plan to use them; suffice to say, one had to do with a strip club, the other had to do with teaching how to make mixed drinks). I was also pleasantly surprised when newly-engaged Juliet Grames dropped by for a few minutes (we met her fiancé on Thursday). Juliet works for Soho Press and is Gary Corby’s editor. “He’s mine!” she said, with justifiable glee. Ray also surprised me by alluding to the time I started an informal flash fiction contest one day in the comments on Janet’s blog. You never know who’s reading, folks! 🙂

Time flew. Janet wanted to go to the Anthony Awards (one of her clients was up for an Anthony), and she also needed to pack. I needed to get on the road. “So,” she said, once Ray and Rosemary had left. “Any questions?” At which point my mind went blank. To be fair, I was at the end of three days where I felt as if I had been thrown into the deep end of the publishing world. If I had gone to Bouchercon simply as a reader, hanging out with book-lovers and meeting writers, I might have simply been star-struck. As it was, I had been spending a goodly amount of time in the company of one of New York’s finest literary agents, being introduced as a friend to other agents, publicists, editors, and authors. I had been sitting in conversations about contracts and publishers, often as the only non-agented writer at the table. In short, the whole three days had left me gloriously overwhelmed. Which is why the best question I could come up with was:

“Can I query you when I’ve finished my novel?”

To which Janet (bless her cotton socks) replied, “Of course.” Since I’m now writing a genre she represents, and she has made it abundantly clear she will accept queries from all-comers, it seems a strange, even redundant, question to ask. But that’s not really what I was asking. Behind that question was all my woodland creature insecurities as an unpublished writer. “Do I have what it takes? Am I really good enough? Have I been making a fool of myself over the last three days, kidding myself I can enter the same league as Patrick, Jeff, Loretta, Alafair, Ray, and Rosemary?” Whether or not Janet saw all that in my question, I don’t know. But I’ll take her “Of course” as a vote of confidence.

And with that, we shook hands, and went our separate ways.

And that was my first Bouchercon. Hopefully, not my last.

10 Bouchercon Swag

My Bouchercon 2015 swag.

Were you at Bouchercon 2015? Feel free to share your thoughts. If you’ve blogged your experience, share the link!

Bouchercon 2015 Debrief: Day Two

In which our hero encounters lone wolves and cadaver dogs, writers with secrets, and a dream come true… almost.

Bouchercon2015LogoThere were no downed power lines Friday morning, so my journey into Raleigh took about as long as it should have the day before. Having learned my lesson with the parking, I paid for the day and double-checked the parking space number. Feeling a lot less frazzled, I made my way to the Sheraton, where I began the day with what looked to be an interesting panel, featuring one of Janet’s clients, Andrew Grant.

Lone Wolves & Loose Cannons in Thrillers, featured Andrew, Ben McPherson, Bruce DeSilva (the moderator), Jerry Ackerman, and Mick Herron. Andrew, Ben, and Mick are all Brits, which gave an interesting slant to the discussion–especially when they got into talking about James Bond. There was some confusion when Bruce introduced Jerry Ackerman. He started reading the bio for writer Jerry Ackerman when Jerry stopped him. “I’m Gerard Ackerman, FBI Special Agent. I go by Jerry, but I also write as Alistair Kimble.” Oh. Well. Nevermind. This Jerry still had some useful things to say on the topic, so no-one was bothered (at least that I could tell). Before the discussion started, Bruce got out his shot glass for every time the name “Jack Reacher” was mentioned.

As you might have guessed, the “lone wolf” or “loose cannon” under discussion is that hero figure who seems to operate on his own, even if he is part of an organization. He lives by his own rules, free of ties and responsibilities. Jack Reacher (*slurp*) is a good example of this: someone who travels around with nothing more than the clothes on his back, saving the day wherever he goes. How old is this literary figure? It goes back to the days of the knight errant, maybe even Beowulf, or even Odysseus. The panel discussed the appeal of such a figure–why does he seem to be so popular, especially since many of them have some quite unlikable traits (e.g. Sherlock Holmes). Perhaps that’s part of it: they say and do things that would have terrible consequences if done in real life. They give us, the reader as well as the writer, an outlet for that because they can ride off into the sunset without a care.

In a sense, the “lone wolf” thriller is like most children’s books where the parents or guardians are absent, so there are no authority figures around. The kids have to figure out for themselves what to do, and push the boundaries to find out how far they can go.

It seems these figures also appeal to that sense of “rugged individualism” that speaks to the American spirit, that distrust of authority. Although in the UK, it’s not so much a distrust of authority, but a willingness to stand up to wrongdoing. Brits have a strange notion of noblesse oblige, where if someone is in need of help, they feel obliged to help them.

Conversation turned to James Bond, especially in light of Daniel Craig’s recent comment that he would rather slit his wrists than play Bond again. (He later softened that and said he would do another Bond movie, but it would only be for the money–not for love of playing the character.) A number of panelists expressed frustration at the way the Bond franchise is being handled. James Bond was a product of his time, a time when the UK was in post-war decline having lost an Empire, and slowly becoming irrelevant on the world stage. The country was also struggling financially. People were still using ration cards in the 1950s. James Bond spoke to that, presenting a powerful British figure in expensive suits, leading a flashy lifestyle. When the Russians threaten the world, who does the CIA call? James Bond. The current attempt to “update” Bond, and make him more “realistic” is, the panel felt, misguided. In doing that, you lose that whole sense of what James Bond is about, what he represents.

The panel observed how the lone wolf tends to be male, and wondered if perhaps this kind of hero is, for the most part, a male fantasy. It also seems this larger-than-life hero needs a larger-than-life villain, which is why you tend to find such pairings in these kind of thrillers.

Finally, they addressed the question whether it’s responsible to be writing these kinds of books given the violence of our society. The panelists were all quick to point out that no book, movie, or video game has ever put violence into the mind of someone who was not already disposed to act violently. You can’t conflate fiction and reality, and most readers don’t. The vast majority of people who enjoy these books understand they are fiction and appreciate them for what they are. Those that use them as the basis for violence would find some other expression for their violence if such books didn’t exist. The problem is with the person, not the literature.

01 0830 Lone Wolves and Loose Cannons in Thrillers (Panel)

Lone Wolves & Loose Cannons in Thrillers. L-R: Bruce DeSilva, Gerard Ackerman, Andrew Grant, Mick Herron, and Ben McPherson

I’ve read some of Andrew’s books, so once the panel was over, I took the opportunity to shake his hand and thank him for his comments (he was an excellent panelist, fielding the questions with full and informed answers). I asked him whether he writes as a British or an American author, since he splits his time between London and Chicago. He told me that at first he didn’t feel qualified to write as an American, but now, with four books under his belt, he’s getting more comfortable with writing in an American context. His protagonist, David Trevellyan, is British, so it’s natural for him to think and speak as a Brit. I noted that there were some Britishisms, and even references to British TV shows in his second novel, DIE TWICE, that Americans probably wouldn’t get–how did these slide by his US editor? He said they discussed them and decided that American audiences could either figure out their meaning from the context, or look them up.

DeathAndTheRedHeadedWomanI took a moment to get my bearings after looking up at Andrew Grant (that man is tall), then went down to the lobby to see if there was anyone there I knew. The lobby areas of both hotels appeared to be the place for meetings. Not just authors catching up, but agent/editor/client business meetings, too. It was in the lobby of the Sheraton that Janet called for my assistance. She was in the middle of a meeting, and needed someone to help one of her clients, Loretta Sue Ross, who had just checked in. This was Loretta’s first Bouchercon, and since I had been here a day, I was already a veteran compared to her. I hadn’t decided on my next panel, and Loretta was on my list of people to meet, so I gladly responded to the call.

I found Loretta near the registration desks, and spent the rest of the morning showing her around and chatting about books (she’s a Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams fan–woohoo!) and the fact she drove 1,300 miles all the way from Missouri to be there. And she wasn’t even on any panels, or doing any signings. That’s how worthwhile Bouchercon is!

Loretta then left to get her phone from her hotel, and I decided to drop in on the Bouchercon General Members Meeting. This is where Bouchercon attendees get to hear reports from the various committees responsible for conducting Bouchercon business, and also vote on board member nominations and future Bouchercon hosting bids. This year, Dallas bid for Bouchercon 2019, and Sacramento bid for Bouchercon 2020. Representatives of those regional Bouchercon groups presented their plans, telling us how large the convention area will be, what transportation will be available, and the proximity of food and alcohol (of course). Both bids received unanimous approval. For those interested, here’s where the next five Bouchercons will be:

2016: New Orleans, LA (September 15-18)

2017: Toronto, Canada (October 12-15)

2018: St. Petersburg, FL (September 13-16)

2019: Dallas, TX (October 31-November 4) 50th Anniversary!

2020: Sacramento, CA (TBD)

03 1130 Bouchercon General Members Meeting

Bouchercon 2015 General Members Meeting

As I wandered through the Marriott on my way to the next panel, I noticed bright lights and camera. “Bookwatch,” a show on North Carolina Public Television, was filming an interview. Of course “Bookwatch” would be here!

04 Bookwatch at the Marriott

The next panel I went to was called What the Dog Knows: The Science and Wonder of the Working Cadaver Dog, hosted by Cat Warren, Kate Flora, and Corporal Brad Kirby of the Durham Sheriff Department, along with his dog, Dreyfus. Dreyfus is cross-trained in both cadaver and explosives/firearms detection, and Cpl. Kirby gave us a demonstration of Dreyfus’s skill. To simulate a cadaver, I believe he used an object with a couple of drops of human blood on it (the dogs know the difference between human and non-human blood). He then let Dreyfus loose to do his thing, which he did successfully.

06 1300 Dreyfus in Action 1

Cat Warren, who trains cadaver dogs, then talked about the kinds of things we, as writers, ought to know about the training and work of the cadaver dog. Such as:

  • Dogs can be cross-trained to detect, for example, explosives or human remains. The dog is usually trained to know which to look for. If Dreyfus is wearing his harness and is told to lie down, he knows he is about to look for human remains. If he’s not wearing his harness, and is told to sit, he knows he is about to look for explosives. While looking for explosives, he will pass over human remains, and vice versa.
  • The scent from a body can take a few weeks to rise, so cadaver dogs will often be taken back to the scene after a couple of weeks to double-check.
  • Cadaver dogs can detect scent in water down to about 240-260 feet. “Volatiles” rise in water, which makes detection a little easier.
  • Frozen bodies don’t give off a scent, which you should know from taking meat out of the freezer.
  • People think cadaver dogs get depressed since all they ever do is look for dead bodies. This idea circulated particularly after 9-11, but it’s complete nonsense. To the dogs, they’re doing their job. Indeed, it’s a game to them. Cadaver dogs aren’t trained to look for live bodies.
10 1300 Cpl Brad Kirby, Durham Sheriff Department

What the Dog Knows. L-R: Cat Warren, Kate Flora, and Corporal Brad Kirby

My last panel for the day was called Political Espionage Thrillers: Pre- and Post-Edward Snowden, with Gayle Lynds, Marc Cameron, Mark Greaney (the moderator), Susan Ella MacNeal, and Terry Shames. As well as being writers, each of the panelists either does, or has, worked in some capacity for a US government agency, and has been granted some level of Top Secret security clearance. So they all know more about this topic than they are at liberty to say…!

First, the panelists were surprised by how many people were surprised about what Snowden revealed. Terry said she is not only surprised at how naive Americans are about what’s going on, but she is surprised and disturbed with how little the government does with what it knows. One thing all the panelists agreed on was that the conversation on surveillance spawned by the information Snowden revealed is good, but this is overshadowed by the fact that Snowden’s lack of discrimination led to many agents being burned, and many losing their lives. For that, he is rightly condemned as a traitor. He could have taken a moral stand with regard to eavesdropping without also revealing the names and locations of US agents. But he chose not to do that.

As I noted earlier, each of the panelists, with the exception of Susan who writes historical fiction, has privileged knowledge about top secret US programs. It seems that even if the information they know becomes declassified and public knowledge, they are still prohibited from speaking about it. And even when that prohibition is lifted, many get into the habit of secrecy. There are World War II veterans who still won’t talk about things that used to be classified but are now public knowledge, even though they are no longer obliged to keep silent.

Has Snowden affected how they write? For the most part, no. Maybe the window dressing’s a little different, and there are things that have come to light that could affect plots, but fundamentally, they are still writing stories about good versus evil.

11 1430 Political Espionage Thrillers--Pre and Post-Edward Snowden (Panel)

Political Espionage Thrillers: Pre- and Post-Edward Snowden. L-R: Gayle Lynds, Marc Cameron, Susan Ella MacNeal, Terry Shames, Mark Greaney

Janet had planned for us to meet up after this panel, along with fellow blog commenter, Donna Everhart. Loretta and I found Donna, but no Janet. After waiting a little while, wandering the halls of the Marriott, we decided to head over to the Sheraton, and Janet’s adopted watering hole (Jimmy V’s). And that’s where we found her, not in the bar I hasten to add, but in the lobby having a meeting. We talked and wandered around until Janet was finished doing her agent-y thing.

As soon as we entered Jimmy V’s, Janet asked if her table was available (the one in front of the main desk), and if Grace could serve us again. The manager politely informed Janet that, in fact, Grace was not wait staff; she was a bus person (someone who clears and cleans tables, for those not familiar with the term). “Nevertheless,” insisted Janet, “can’t we give her a promotion for the evening?” Somehow, Janet got her way. I don’t know how. Maybe it was her smile and winning personality…


So, Grace became our server, and I asked her for food recommendations. “I haven’t eaten a lot of the food here,” Grace said, “but I have had the mac and cheese–it’s very good.” And she was right.

As the afternoon wore on, we were joined at our table by Patrick Lee (nytba), and Jim Ringel, also one of Janet’s clients. To my delight we were also joined by literary agent extraordinaire Barbara Poelle! Barbara represents a lot of notable writers including Lauren DeStefano (nytba), Sophie Littlefield, and C.J. Lyons (nytba). She also writes an agony aunt-type column for Writers’ Digest called “Funny You Should Ask…” which is hilarious and worth the cover price of the magazine alone. It has been one of my ambitions to share a table with Barbara Poelle and Janet Reid, so this was almost a dream-come-true. Barbara couldn’t engage with us long because she had to meet with someone. That someone turned up, so Barbara sat with her at the table next to ours and had her meeting, while we carried on our conversation. On reflection it was a bit surreal, but I suppose the whole idea of drinking and chatting with bestselling authors and publishing professionals was already kind of mind-blowing for an aspiring author like me.

12 Barbara Poelle and NYT Bestselling Author Patrick Lee

Barbara Poelle and Patrick Lee (nytba). Sorry for the shaky picture. I was clearly overwhelmed. 🙂

Before too long, the afternoon wore out, and the manager approached Janet to inform her that they needed Grace to return to her real job for the evening rush. Janet relented, but not before giving Grace a hug and thanking her for her service.

Earlier, I had purchased a copy of Donna Andrews’ latest, LORD OF THE WINGS, for my wife, a big Donna Andrews fan. Janet, who is a friend of Ms. Andrews, told me she could persuade Donna to sign it. And lo and behold, who should turn up at our table!

13 Donna Andrews Signing April's Book

Unfortunately, Donna couldn’t stay, but that was okay. We carried on for a few more hours until we decided to call it a night. One of the moderators for a panel tomorrow had fallen ill and wasn’t able to attend, and the organizers had asked Janet to take her place. Janet wanted to spend some time preparing for that, and we were all tired anyway.

So that ended day two of Bouchercon.

Come back tomorrow for my third and final day…